Elias Ymer vs Marco Trungelliti Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

E. Ymer vs M. Trungelliti

Elias Ymer
Elias Ymer

Flag SWE SWE

w
l
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
l
Marco Trungelliti
Marco Trungelliti

Flag ARG ARG

l
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l

3

Win

4

Played

1

Win

29
Age
35
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
5'10" (178 cm)
169
C. Rank
135
105
Best Rank
112
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.0M
Career Money
$1.2M
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Ymer 3 - 1 Trungelliti

They have played 11 sets in total, with Elias Ymer winning 7 and Marco Trungelliti winning 4. The last match between Elias Ymer and Marco Trungelliti was at the Wimbledon - London, 26-06-2024, Round: Q2, Surface: Grass, with Elias Ymer getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Ymer3
Trungelliti1
Last 4 H2H Matches:

(Q2Wimbledon - London(06-26-24)

Grass
SWE Flag
Elias Ymer
6
6
6
ARG Flag
Marco Trungelliti
7
4
2

(R1Maia Challenger(11-28-23)

Clay
SWE Flag
Elias Ymer
6
6
6
ARG Flag
Marco Trungelliti
7
2
4

(Q1Aix En Provence Challenger(09-05-20)

Clay
SWE Flag
Elias Ymer
7
6
ARG Flag
Marco Trungelliti
6
1

E. Ymer vs M. Trungelliti H2H Profile

Stats
$1,017,940Career Prize Money$1,168,943
54.44% (435-364)Career Total W/L58.90% (599-418)
2Clay1
1Grass0
11Titles15
3Total H2H Matches1
50.00% (3-3)YTD Win/Loss0.00% (0-1)

E. Ymer vs M. Trungelliti Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Elias Ymer has won 43.80% of points on their second serve, while Marco Trungelliti has won 42.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Elias Ymer, in recent form, has won 48.22% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marco Trungelliti has won 45.00%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.71% and 29.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Elias Ymer has saved 53.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marco Trungelliti has saved 60.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Elias Ymer has won 52.17% of matches played (W/L 36/33), with Marco Trungelliti winning 60.27% (W/L 44/29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Elias Ymer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 241/168), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 91/105). Marco Trungelliti has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 480/295), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 15/28).
  • Player level: In the last year, Elias Ymer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 30/27), where as Marco Trungelliti has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.52% of matches (W/L 37/17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Elias Ymer winning 3 times and Marco Trungelliti being victorious 1 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Elias Ymer winning 7 and Marco Trungelliti winning 4.
  • The last match between Elias Ymer and Marco Trungelliti was at the Wimbledon - London, 26-06-2024, Round: Q2, Surface: Grass, with Elias Ymer getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:13.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Elias Ymer and Marco Trungelliti have played a deciding set 3 times, with Elias Ymer winning 2 times and Marco Trungelliti 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Elias Ymer winning 1, and Marco Trungelliti 2.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Elias Ymer has played against opponents with an average rank of 285.28 while Marco Trungelliti has played against players with an average rank of 239.68.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Elias Ymer has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marco Trungelliti has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Elias Ymer has converted 35.87% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marco Trungelliti has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Elias Ymer vs Marco Trungelliti Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. Ymer vs M. Trungelliti H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
3H2H Matches Won1
7Sets Won4
60Games Won49
26Aces (Total)11
9Total Double Faults16
2:19:13Average Match Time2:19:13
61% (224/367)1st Serve %61% (242/400)
71% (159/224)1st Serve Win %68% (164/242)
55% (79/143)2nd Serve Win %48% (76/158)
35% (14/40)Break Pts Won %26% (8/31)
40% (160/400)Return Points Win %35% (129/367)
75% (3/4)Best‑of‑3 Win %25% (1/4)
67% (2/3)Deciding Set Win %33% (1/3)
50% (1/2)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/2)
50% (1/2)1st Set Won, Lost Match100% (2/2)
100% (2/2)1st Set Lost, Won Match50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Ymer 48%, Trungelliti 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Ymer 51%, Trungelliti 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Ymer 58%, Trungelliti 61%.

E. Ymer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardYokohama Challenger - 17-11-2025

R1

USAK. Bigun
L
3-0 ret.
I.hardKobe Challenger - 10-11-2025

F

JPNY. Watanuki
L
3-6 6-1 6-4

SF

JPNK. Uchida
W
6-4 4-6 6-3

QF

SUIM. Huesler
W
7-5 5-7 6-4

R2

JPNR. Tokuda
W
6-1 0-1 ret.

M. Trungelliti Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardHellenic Championship - Athens - 03-11-2025

Q1

USAM. Mcdonald
L
2-6 6-2 7-5
I.hardBrest Challenger - 20-10-2025

R1

FRAD. Added
L
7-5 6-3
I.hardEuropean Open - Brussels - 13-10-2025

Q1

BELG. Arnaud
L
6-3 7-6(6)
ClayValencia Challenger - 06-10-2025

QF

ESPC. Taberner
L
6-4 6-4

R2

ESPP. Martin
W
6-4 ret.
banner

E. Ymer vs M. Trungelliti Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
54.44% (435/364)YTD Win/Loss58.90% (599/418)
52.86% (1015/905)Sets Win/Loss55.51% (1345/1078)
51.10% (9459/9053)Games Win/Loss51.67% (12040/11261)
46.43% (91/105)Hard Win/Loss54.29% (95/80)
58.92% (241/168)Clay Win/Loss61.94% (480/295)
53.80% (92/79)Indoor Hard W/L34.09% (15/29)
47.83% (11/12)Grass Win/Loss39.13% (9/14)
0.33Aces Per Game0.24
3018Aces Total2721
0.24Double Faults Per Game0.23
2207Total Double Faults2633
1:33:19Average Match Time1:19:45
491.9Average Opponent Rank534.43
59% (31587/53166)1st Serve %57% (33175/57746)
69% (21918/31587)1st Serve Win %68% (22521/33175)
49% (10493/21579)2nd Serve Win %49% (12151/24571)
41% (2099/5107)Break Points Won % (Total)42% (2531/6006)
39% (20520/52291)Return Points Win %41% (23361/57260)
52.05% (38/35)Slam W/L55.10% (54/44)
36.67% (11/19)Masters W/L50.00% (7/7)
50.00% (17/17)Cups W/L0% (0/0)
47.44% (74/82)Main Tour W/L50.93% (55/53)
55.37% (237/191)Challenger W/L57.90% (337/245)
74.36% (58/20)Futures W/L67.91% (146/69)
55% (415/756)Best of 3 Sets Win %59% (578/980)
39% (11/28)Best of 5 Sets Win %56% (10/18)
47% (128/274)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)52% (177/338)
53% (158/297)Deciding Set Win %61% (234/381)
82% (418/344)1st Set Won, Won Match86% (530/458)
17% (418/72)1st Set Won, Lost Match14% (530/72)
23% (381/88)1st Set Lost, Won Match29% (487/141)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
ESPP. V. Marcos
CZEM. Mrva7
W1
1.833
W2
1.85
03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
AUTS. Sorger
KAZD. Yevseyev
W1
2.4
W2
1.49
05:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
ARGA. Collarini8
ARGM. Kestelboim
W1
1.39
W2
2.72
01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
JPNS. Mochizuki1
ITAF. ArnaboldiLL
W1
1.138
W2
4.8
02:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
ROUC. Cretuq
ITAF. BondioliLL
W1
1.64
W2
2.1
07:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction
THAM. Jones
JPNR. Taguchiq
W1
1.29
W2
3.2